Цельнотянуто у scholar_vit
Oct. 18th, 2008 07:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
vryadliAn interesting op-ed chart in today's New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/10/14/opinion/20081014_OPCHART.html
October 14, 2008
Bulls, Bears, Donkeys and Elephants
By TOMMY McCALL
Since 1929, Republicans and Democrats have each controlled the presidency for nearly 40 years. So which party has been better for American pocketbooks and capitalism as a whole? Well, here’s an experiment: imagine that during these years you had to invest exclusively under either Democratic or Republican administrations. How would you have fared?
As of Friday, a $10,000 investment in the S.& P. stock market index* would have grown to $11,733 if invested under Republican presidents only, although that would be $51,211 if we exclude Herbert Hoover’s presidency during the Great Depression. Invested under Democratic presidents only, $10,000 would have grown to $300,671 at a compound rate of 8.9 percent over nearly 40 years.
---------
не повидуешь умным либретарям, старадающим интеллектуальной порядочностью.
=вычитал у новго нобелевца: ==============
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/opinion/20krugman.html?ref=opinion
for the first time on record, an economic expansion failed to raise most Americans’ incomes above their previous peak.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/10/14/opinion/20081014_OPCHART.html
October 14, 2008
Bulls, Bears, Donkeys and Elephants
By TOMMY McCALL
Since 1929, Republicans and Democrats have each controlled the presidency for nearly 40 years. So which party has been better for American pocketbooks and capitalism as a whole? Well, here’s an experiment: imagine that during these years you had to invest exclusively under either Democratic or Republican administrations. How would you have fared?
As of Friday, a $10,000 investment in the S.& P. stock market index* would have grown to $11,733 if invested under Republican presidents only, although that would be $51,211 if we exclude Herbert Hoover’s presidency during the Great Depression. Invested under Democratic presidents only, $10,000 would have grown to $300,671 at a compound rate of 8.9 percent over nearly 40 years.
---------
не повидуешь умным либретарям, старадающим интеллектуальной порядочностью.
=вычитал у новго нобелевца: ==============
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/opinion/20krugman.html?ref=opinion
for the first time on record, an economic expansion failed to raise most Americans’ incomes above their previous peak.
